Search for: "Georgia v. Coleman"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Fla. 1995) (same).GeorgiaThe Georgia consumer protection provides only for injunctive relief, Ga. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Georgia, Atlanta Division. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
If an earlier opinion "fairly appear[s] to rest primarily upon federal law," Coleman, ante at 501 U. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
(Ron Coleman’s Likelihood of Confusion) ONEL – Pieter Veeze’s 2010 Markenforum speech (Class 46) France Cour d’appel Paris: French law implementing London Protocol procedural so to be enforced immediately with retroactive effect: Unilever v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
: General Motors LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Bradwell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:18 pm
Chesser v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court cases, Reagan v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Maersk Contractrors USA, Inc (IP Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Columbia University’s School for Engineering and Applied Science – Columbia’s patented smart grid technology to power FedEx’s NYC EV Fleet (Green Patent Blog) Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products – ALJ Gildea grants motion to terminate investigation in Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices (337-TA-718) based on consent order (ITC Law Blog) GS Cleantech –… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm
The 16-unit Coleman Hill complex, which caters to law students, sits just across Georgia Avenue from the law school.McDaniel’s absence from class struck Whitmire as suspicious:“There were some friends that were supposed to have been out searching [for Lauren Giddings] the night before. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
Coleman, 113 F.3d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir. 1997). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
But would we have preferred the Minnesota procedure in Coleman v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
Georgia, was argued in the Supreme Court by Anthony Amsterdam. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Coleman of Austin, Texas, that, when the record actually assembled by Congress is examined, “I don’t understand how you can maintain that things have radically changed. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Rev. 265-298 (2011).Coleman, Felicia C. and Laura E. [read post]
