Search for: "Gerard v Cahill"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
For example, in Gerard v Cahill, 66 AD3d 957 [2d Dept 2009], the court allowed a claim for an alleged oral buyout agreement to survive a motion for summary judgment, ruling that the “oral agreement was a separate, additional agreement addressing a scenario that was not anticipated and not covered by the terms of the operating agreement. [read post]