Search for: "German v. Corrections Corporation of America"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am
Such a technical issue as lodging the appeal to the correct addressee might put them to the test. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
Something akin to the German remedy of correction is required in its two forms of retraction and rectification. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) District Court S D California: Certificates of correction can overreach: Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) - 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India's visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) - 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India's visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) – 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India’s visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
The Brinkmann Corporation (TTABlog) Fraud is really hard to prove – TTAB decision in Slaska Wytwornia Wodek Gatunkowtch “Polmos” SA v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Start using the correct fax number! [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
And the song that inspired one of America’s greatest freedom fights was made the subject of a battle over its own. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Act thus cannot be justified by Bishop v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
However, the Daily Mail has now published a correction stating: “In fact, while the Cabinet Secretary agreed that her husband should have informed her about the payment, he made no criticism of Dame Tessa“. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
British Broadcasting Corporation [2017] EWHC 1291 (Ch)). [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:58 am
Maffick v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
One user said that “a ticket was purchased through a German airline for nearly $600” leaving her with a negative account balance of $500 (Kuchera). [read post]
