Search for: "Giambrone v. Giambrone"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Giambrone v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Giambrone v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:26 am
In the 2009 Ontario case Cavaliere v Corvex Manufacturing, the plaintiff sued the company for wrongful dismissal. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 3:16 pm
In Saab, et al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:01 am
Servs. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:52 am
SPCP Group LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:31 pm
Back in June, reporting in the Solicitors Journal on Master Hurst’s preliminary ruling on proportionality in Motto v Trafigura Ltd [2011] EWHC 90201 (Costs), I started by paraphrasing Humpty Dumpty: “proportionality means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less” It will be recalled that Master Hurst had relied on Morland J’s judgment in Giambrone v JMC Holidays [2002] EWHC 2932 (QB): “For my part I do not accept that if… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:59 am
Yitzhak (C 46636-07-11) Coward v Phaestos Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 1292 (Ch) (17 May 2013) Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins & Anor[2012] EWHC 2952 (01 November 2012) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Stan James Plc & Ors[2013] EWCA Civ 27 (06 February 2013) Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc[2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) (21 May 2013) Martin & Ors Gabriele v Giambrone P/A Giambrone & Law [2013] NIQB 48 (5 March 2013)… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
"[M]ere speculation about a loss resulting from an attorney's alleged omission is insufficient to sustain a prima facie case of legal malpractice" (Siciliano v Forchelli & Forchelli, 17 AD3d 343, 345; see Dupree v Voorhees, 68 AD3d 810, 812-813; Plymouth Org., Inc. v Silverman, Collura & Chernis, P.C., 21 AD3d 464; Giambrone v Bank of N.Y., 253 AD2d 786). [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
Developer Pleads Guilty To Leaving Asbestos During Historic Renovation, September 7, 2016, By Andrew Giambrone, Washington City Paper More Blog Entries: Rondon v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at 180; Hashmi… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
The fact that, at the first stage, the costs as a whole appear to be proportionate does not prevent the court from finding that individual items are disproportionate and applying the test of necessity to them alone (Giambrone v JMC Holidays [2002] EWHC 2932 (QB))Going back to the original question, the issue of proportionality can be a useful tool in nibbling at the edges of the costs claimed. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:56 am
It is well discussed in O’Halloran v Metropolitan Transp. [read post]
