Search for: "Gibbs v. King*" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm by Simon Gibbs
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] The post Costs webinar on Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP first appeared on Legal Costs Specialists - Gibbs… [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm by Simon Gibbs
And then there was the decision in MGN v UK. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 10:48 pm by GWS Law
Significant costs, and much valuable court time, is taken up re-arguing identical points of principle in costs litigation due to the absence of a binding authority. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am by INFORRM
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:40 am
In Findlay v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Stephen Page
”If there were any doubt about the role of the wife as a director, that was done away with by Debelle J in Group 4 Industries Pty Ltd v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am by INFORRM
FIO Act 2000, s 43 (prejudicial to commercial interests): Please download: Michael Garrard v IC EA/2009/0107. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am by Jennifer
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am by INFORRM
   The appeal is discussed by Frances Gibb in the Times. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:14 am by charonqc
I can see Mr Farage shouting obscenities at opposing football fans and flicking V signs, safe in the knowledge that the Police presence will ensure that there is no ‘physical’ retaliation. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:23 am by Dr Richard Cornes
” The line, “we are a court, and not a law reform body”, it will be recalled was one strand of Lady Hale’s dissent in the Radmacher v Granatino decision. [read post]