Search for: "Gibson v. District of Columbia"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
This conference brings you the latest updates and developments in light of such things as the Digital Single Market, the Investigatory Powers Bill, and the legal implications of Brexit Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ziggy Mosslmani, a Sydney man who sued for defamation after being ridiculed online because of his mullet, has suffered a setback in his case as District Court judge Judith Gibson struck out the teenager’s imputations of ridicule… [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Law, Life and Government in Red River, by Dale Gibson, published by McGill Queen’s University Press. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) rejected a challenge to 2014 EPA rules regulating emission testing requirements for new motor vehicles, 40 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
The Historical Society of the District of Columbia presents Separation of Powers and the Independent Counsel: Morrison v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
When last I wrote on this website about the plan, around two years ago, elected legislatures in eight states (Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington, Vermont and California) and the District of Columbia—comprising 132 electoral college votes altogether (almost half the needed 270 votes)—had adopted the idea. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
To date, the legislatures of ten states and the District of Columbia—which collectively account for 165 electoral college votes, well more than half of the 270 needed for the NPV bill to become effective—have passed laws to adopt the measure. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the 2008 law and the “metrics and standards” that had emerged under that regime violated the non-delegation doctrine. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
’” Brown, 607 F.2d at 700 (quoting Gibson Wine Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
To be sure, Bickel was more than willing to defend Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
District Court, District of Columbia (Washington). [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am
At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks focuses primarily on the amicus brief filed by Senators John McCain and Sheldon Whitehouse, who urge the Court to deny review, while Matt Gouras of the Associated Press has coverage of an amicus brief submitted by twenty-two states and the District of Columbia in support of Montana. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
District of Columbia, No. 10-CV-632 (D.C. [read post]
