Search for: "Gibson v. Florida Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Florida Bar, in which a 5-4 majority upheld a Florida law that forbids candidates running in contested elections for judicial office from personally soliciting campaign contributions, even though the state permits such candidates to raise money through surrogates (campaign committees) and also allows candidates to find out who contributed to their campaigns. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Matthew Streb
Florida Bar to uphold the state’s solicitation law comes as a surprise. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:23 pm by Walter Olson
Florida courts allow probe of finances of MDs who treat many injury plaintiffs [Dolman Law Group; Crable v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:59 pm by The Recorder
Theodore Boutrous, the Gibson Dunn & Crutcher partner who got the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
As further evidence of how expensive this litigation is, both sides have a slew of high-priced experts. 1-800 Contacts has 6 experts: Howard Hogan (Gibson Dunn), Dr. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
August 25, 2015) — DC Circuit issued a ruling affirming dismissal of a lawsuit challenging a “pay-to-play” rule adopted by the SEC in 2010, holding that the rule could only be challenged in the federal courts of appeal; it was also time-barred. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by CJLF Staff
  Matt Bittle of the Delaware State News reports that in Rauf v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
Florida and Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Another case worth noting: the Florida case barring pediatricians from asking about whether there are guns in the house. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:32 pm by Student Lawyer
The most recent ruling in a case challenging the constitutionality of a main provision of DOMA involves a California plaintiff who works for the federal government and was denied health benefits for her same-sex spouse (Golinski v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:32 pm by Student Lawyer
The most recent ruling in a case challenging the constitutionality of a main provision of DOMA involves a California plaintiff who works for the federal government and was denied health benefits for her same-sex spouse (Golinski v. [read post]