Search for: "Gibson v. Sharp" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Rejecting the appeal, and applying Barnet v Crozier, Sharp LJ observed that ‘the court is unlikely to intervene in the absence of any real or substantial unfairness to the objecting or other third party and ‘nit-picks’ are to be discouraged’. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sharp LJ refused the application for permission to appeal in the case of Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Law, Life and Government in Red River, by Dale Gibson, published by McGill Queen’s University Press. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 19 February 2015, District Court Judge Judith Gibson summarily dimissed the claim in the case of Time for Monkey Enterprises v Southern Cross Austereo [2015] NSWDC 13. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by Ken Kersch
James Bradley Thayer played a role in this (as he did in recovering Pennsylvania Judge John Bannister Gibson’s dissent in Eakin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
(Comments are closed as the article relates to ongoing legal proceedings, as Janine Gibson, editor in chief of Guardian US, explained on Twitter. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
, has expressed concern, stating: “Matters of such public importance and interest should be allowed to be discussed freely and with the highest degree of legal protection.” Next week in the courts On Monday 31 October 2011, the trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd will begin before Sharp J (without a jury). [read post]