Search for: "Gideon v. Gideon" Results 61 - 80 of 801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 9:50 am by Albert Wan
 Some even went so far as to call the decisions in Frye and Lafler the “new Gideon”. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 8:35 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Next Monday, March 18, at the Texas capitol there will be an event celebrating the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:37 pm by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this recent article by Professor Beth Colgan, the abstract of which states: To protect the “noble ideal” that “every defendant stands equal before the law,” Gideon v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
Students in Niagara Region won’t be getting those Gideon Bibles so many Canadians remember receiving in class unless their local school board agrees to let atheists distribute their own materials.That’s the word from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, which ruled on an atheist father’s challenge to the long-standing practice of distributing Gideon Bibles in schools last week in R.C. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
Yesterday, according to CNS News, the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Doe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 5:09 am
Gideon is hurt by that as much as it is by judicial actions such as this. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:55 am by Teri Rodriguez
On March 18, Texas will mark the 50th year of Gideon v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:00 am
Abel, Associate Director of the Brennan Center for Justice, addresses how to insure that civil Gideon be implemented in a way that maximizes the competence and diligence of the attorneys who fulfill this role (A Right to Counsel in Civil Cases: Lessons from Gideon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:01 pm
A copy of the text is below: Letters ABA's Civil Gideon Position Left Out Your coverage in the July 13 ABA Journal eReport of the issues presented in King v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:15 pm
A Consent Judgment (full text) has been entered by a Louisiana federal district court in Roe v. [read post]