Search for: "Gila River Indian Community" Results 41 - 60 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 10:24 am by Steven M. Taber
Monday, March 28, 2011 RULES Approval and Promulgation of Gila River Indian Community’s Tribal Implementation Plan [EPA-R09-OAR-2007-0296, FRL-9259-9]. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
H.R.4026: Pala Band of Mission Indians Land Transfer Act of 2017.H.R.4032:  Gila River Indian Community Federal Rights-of-Way, Easements and Boundary Clarification Act.H.R.4070: Central Coast Heritage Protection Act. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
H.R.4026: Pala Band of Mission Indians Land Transfer Act of 2017.H.R.4032:  Gila River Indian Community Federal Rights-of-Way, Easements and Boundary Clarification Act.H.R.4070: Central Coast Heritage Protection Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Placement)Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Andrew Ramonas
The Gila River Indian Community gave Akin Gump $240,000 during the first quarter of 2011 for the law firm’s lobbying efforts. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Lawrence (Attorney Fees) Gila River Indian Community, and San Carlos Apache Tribe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:56 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Danforth Opening Brief GRIC Answer Brief Child’s Answer Brief Reply [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Located in Maricopa County, Chandler is bordered by Mesa, Tempe, Phoenix, Gilbert, and the Gila River Indian Community. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Unknown
Noem's Mount Rushmore lawsuit sparks legal fight with tribe In new ad campaign, tribal coalition urges Biden to ‘restore and expand’ Bears Ears monument Colonization’s dark history puts heavy burden on tribes seeking repatriation of remains, objects Protocol will help guide Indigenous knowledges and data collecting, sharing, interpretation and storage Indigenous healthcare professional and student discuss their journeys in the healthcare field The Gila… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:27 pm by Unknown
S.371 - A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior to take certain land located in Pinal County, Arizona, into trust for the benefit of the Gila River Indian Community, and for other purposes. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:34 pm by Breyer Law Offices
Chandler is situated in Maricopa County and is bordered by Tempe, Mesa, Gilbert, Phoenix, and the Gila River Indian Community. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Responsible for fair and impartial administration of justice pursuant to the judicial powers granted by the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC) and  in ensuring SRPMIC adherence to applicable Federal, Tribal and other relevant laws and ordinances.The Licensed Associate Judge is appointed by the Council. [read post]
31 May 2013, 3:33 pm by National Indian Law Library
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/currentcta.htmCases featured:Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 8:57 am by Unknown
H.R.478 - To direct the Secretary of the Interior to take certain land located in Pinal County, Arizona, into trust for the benefit of the Gila River Indian Community, and for other purposes. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:55 pm by Breyer Law Offices
Ahwatukee is bordered by Interstate 10 on the east, by South Mountain Park on the north, by the Gila River Indian reservation on the south, and by state owned land on the west. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:16 am by Breyer Law Offices
With an approximate population of 247,000, Chandler is situation in Maricopa County and is surrounded by the busy cities of Mesa, Phoenix, Gilbert, Tempe, and also the Gila River Indian Community. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
Chandler is located in Maricopa County and is bordered by Tempe, Mesa, Gilbert, Phoenix, and the Gila River Indian Community. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
When I first handled a Gila River Indian Community probation case, almost every defendant automatically got the max unless the prosecutor was willing to cut them a deal. [read post]