Search for: "Giles v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [4] See Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:34 am
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
The USCO emphasizes that authorship has to be limited to the creations of “human authors”, according to some US case-law dating back to 1884 (Supreme Court Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:13 am
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
From Blankenship v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Giles v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:57 am
” For example, in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:40 am
See State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
Copyright Office stated that they “will refuse to register a claim if it determines that a human being did not create the work. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
Copyright Office stated that they “will refuse to register a claim if it determines that a human being did not create the work. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:41 am
Caren Myers Morrison (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted The State Courts Don't Have Time For Your Crackpot Antiquarianism: A Decade of Domestic Homicides Since Giles v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
(Giles Turner, Bloomberg). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
In reviewing the legal principles which apply in disposal cases, it stated: “[51]. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
The Chancellor stated that only because the font is chipped, it may be removed and destroyed. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:44 am
In 2013, the Supreme Court held in FTC v. [read post]
