Search for: "Giles v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2016, 6:15 am by Giles Peaker
CPR 3.10 also states that the court may remedy the error. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
The post Sufficient Notice by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
The post Sufficient Notice by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm by Giles Peaker
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
: A Swiss Federal Court Addresses the Accusations against a Former Algerian General Gerhard Werle & Paul Christoph Bornkamm, Torture in Zimbabwe under Scrutiny in South Africa: The Judgment of the North Gauteng High Court in SALC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Oregon Dept. of Agriculture (07-474), and Giles v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:40 pm by Giles Peaker
On 13 August 2015, CA wrote to Ms W, stating unequivocally that she could avoid eviction by paying off the arrears. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
The post … don’t live here anymore by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
The post Nuisance and reasonable steps by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
FEC (on constitutionality of the “Millionaire’s Amendment” to campaign finance laws) No. 07-6053, Giles v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 2:08 pm by Giles Peaker
The seizure was stated to be under London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm by Giles Peaker
The post Well I wouldn’t start from here* by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm by Giles Peaker
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]