Search for: "Giles v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2016, 4:27 pm
For myself, I consider it significant also that in the email of 3 February 2014 Mr Shrimpton stated, “I very much wish that I had seen this morning’s application. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:34 pm
The post Vulnerability after Hotak/Johnson/Kanu by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 2:55 pm
£250 for the poor state of the property on readmission. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:49 pm
Home Group Limited v Jacqueline Emery & anor, Edmonton County Court 08/08/16 (County Court decision unreported elsewhere). [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm
On the engagement of Art 8, Kugathas v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31 was followed, per Seldley LJ: “Mr. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
He replied that it would be permissible to state that the person had taken a car without the permission of the owner. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:00 am
At §24, Neuberger J points us towards Secretary of State for Trade and Industry –v- Langridge [1991] Ch. 402, where Balcombe LJ provided a four-question approach: What is the scope and purpose of the Act? [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
By stating the requirement to be “cogent” evidence that there is a sound basis for hope for the future, the standard is pitched at a realistic level. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 11:16 am
In Giles v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:23 am
Each tenancy agreement stated that a deposit had been paid. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm
In this situation the Code states that the Secretary of State considers it is unlikely to be reasonable for a tenant to occupy the property beyond the date in the s.21 notice (1 July 2014). [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am
The decision letter addressed the Mohammed criteria (R v Camden LBC exp Mohammed (1997) 30 HLR 315). [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:58 am
Last weekend I was honored to give the keynote speech at the Giles S. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:06 pm
The PCOL claim stated that possession was sought on the basis of rent arrears. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
Blanket policies are always foolish to adopt… The post Curiosities and wonders by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
8 May 2016, 3:26 pm
The post Homelessness eligibility – revisions underway by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
Ahmad v Newham [2009] PTSR 632 was not relevant where the issue was discrimination, rather than relative allocation of preference. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Giles held that a law that allowed only licensed funeral directors to sell caskets in the state is “irrational. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:06 pm
(on the application of Brighton & Hove City Council) v. [read post]
