Search for: "Gill v State of New York" Results 61 - 80 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Hill, Jacqueline Thomsen reports that “[a] top sociology group fired back at Supreme Court Justice John Roberts for referring to sociology as “’gobbledygook’” during the oral argument last week in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #7 The Freedom of (Illiberal) Association United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In that case, a federal District judge in New York has nullified Section 3. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
Scott Oswald at The Employment Law Group, and Terri Gerstein and Sharon Block in an op-ed for The New York Times. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:13 am by Tony Infanti
More of the same can be expected if the appeals courts uphold the recent federal district court decision in Gill v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Mark Weidemaier
To the extent the bonds are subject to municipal law—such as English or New York law—the same principle would likely apply. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
  In granting summary judgment to the insured plaintiff, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York noted that "while the quality of plaintiff's restaurant smells may be in the nose of the beholder, defendant's 'pollution' argument -- as addressed to the odors here -- is malodorous to this Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, retired Justice John Paul Stevens argues that “[o]verturning [the Supreme Court’s] decision [in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Yahoo News, Roger Parloff reports that the court’s decision whether to “wade into the inherently political quagmire of district mapping” in Gill v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse remarks on the differences between the court’s two pending partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]