Search for: "Gill v. Wells"
Results 121 - 140
of 351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
Supreme Court justices’ speaking engagements typically make headlines for what happens inside, not outside, the venue. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am
At Slate, Palma Joy Strand points to Supreme Court precedent that, in her view, requires the court in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am
” Slate’s Amicus podcast features a discussion of Gill v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 7:28 am
The title may be slightly glib, but a biblical allusion caught my attention as I was reading the briefs in Gill v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:27 am
” Briefly: At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports on the upcoming term’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 12:05 pm
Instead, the court will keep its focus on a quite different case on the issue – the case of Gill v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
From there, we argue a little bit about Justice Neil Gorsuch addressing a classically named Washington junket, hosted at a hotel that really ruined one of our lunch hours, as well as the amicus brief filed by Senators John McCain and Sheldon Whitehouse in Gill v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 7:39 am
One of the more unusual aspects of Gill v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am
Actually, it’s a 2018 case called Gill v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
In Gill v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
This simple truth has been difficult for the plaintiffs in Gill v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 12:05 pm
The second case, Intermarine v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 16-1208 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:40 am
But something interestingly new could happen in this case, which is called Gill v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the court could announce today whether it will review a lower court decision holding that Wisconsin’s “redistricting plan violated the Constitution’s First Amendment and equal rights protections because of partisan gerrymandering”; he explains that the case, Gill v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
At Governing, Alan Greenblatt discusses how the “’efficiency gap,’” which “works by looking at how many votes for one party are wasted,” may provide “the missing piece for complainants” seeking to “statistically prove intent when it comes to partisan gerrymanders” like the one at issue in Gill v. [read post]
