Search for: "Gill v. Whitford" Results 101 - 120 of 244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 7:57 am by Anthony Gaughan
Whitford, the Wisconsin case argued in October 2017, and Benisek v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes observes that after yesterday’s October-sitting opinion from Justice Neil Gorsuch, “it is most likely that Chief Justice Roberts is writing the opinion for the Court in [partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes imagines a scenario in which “Justice Kennedy could still be line to write the  lead opinion in Gill [v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Nicholas Stephanopolous asserts that in one of the cases, Gill v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that Benisek and another partisan-gerrymandering case challenging Republican-drawn maps in Wisconsin that was argued in October, Gill v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf contrasts Benisek with Gill v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:54 am by First Mondays
For the latter, we theorize about why the Supreme Court is hearing another partisan-gerrymandering case when Gill v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of “the latest orders from the Court, and … a close look at Gill v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, some folks are hoping that the Court (in particular Justice Kennedy) will find a way in the Wisconsin districting case argued in October—Gill v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:02 am by Anthony Gaughan
The most important election law case before the United States Supreme Court this term is Gill v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm by Amy Howe
” They told the justices that there “is no reason to treat this case differently from” Gill v. [read post]