Search for: "Givens v. Clarke"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2016, 7:44 am
(Other IPKat articles on court fees are available)The issue has now had direct consideration in an IP case (in which Brandsmiths are involved) by Master Clark: Lifestyles Equities CV & Anor v Sportsdirect.com Retail Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 2092 (Ch). [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 7:49 am
Ben Zion Hershberg of the Louisville Courier Journal reports on the Court of Appeals decision yesterday in the case of Mike Perry, City of Charleston Sewer Dept. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
Read the whole opinion, Clark v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
In Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:34 am
In Andrew v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm
Clark Bldg. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
There was no need for an individual assessment of the proportionality of exercising this power in any given case because the appropriate bargain had already been struck and relied, by analogy, on Lord Scott in Quazi v LB Harrow [2004] 1 AC 983. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
Mathis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) Normally Dave would be covering this kind of case, knowing more about equity and trust right now than I probably ever will. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) Normally Dave would be covering this kind of case, knowing more about equity and trust right now than I probably ever will. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) Normally Dave would be covering this kind of case, knowing more about equity and trust right now than I probably ever will. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:06 pm
Hamdan was given what amounted to a four-month sentence by a military jury. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm
MARLER of MARLER CLARK, LLP (pending admission pro hac vice), pursuant to MCR 2.118(A)(1), to allege and state as follows: I. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Clarke LJ held, applying the principles in Cory v Burr (1883) 8 App Cas 393 and Wayne Tank and Pump Company Ltd v Employers Liability Assurance Corporation Ltd [1974] 1 QB 57, where there are two proximate causes, one that is covered and the other subject to an exclusion, liability will not arise. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:51 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Clark v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:39 am
She was later given treatment for metabolic disturbances given her immense gastrointestinal losses and hospitalized in the ICU for several days receiving critical care. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
For the reasons we have given we conclude that the answer in both cases is £1,000. [read post]
