Search for: "Givens v. Discover Bank et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Ulrich Kranz et al. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[35] The release admits that sometimes a company may not know much more about an incident than that it was material, as commenters highlighted.[36]Investors could overreact to these necessarily vague disclosures, even though a complete assessment would have sparked less concern.[37] Companies may also disclose an incident that is or proves to be non-material,[38] for fear of later SEC admonishment, particularly given the SEC’s warning to companies to err on the side of more… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
” Likewise, in The World Bank Comparative International Study of Court Performance Indicators, A Descriptive and Analytic Account, Buscaglia et al. state: “[t]here is a growing awareness that a judiciary able to resolve cases in a fair and timely manner is an important prerequisite for economic development. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
In addition to selling stamps and shipping packages, branches provide bank transfers, sell lottery tickets and the like. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
In addition to selling stamps and shipping packages, branches provide bank transfers, sell lottery tickets and the like. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
See also Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:01 am
Retail Clerks’ International Union et al.. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
What that means is that when you go to withdraw your money from an ATM you will be charged by the issuing bank and probably by the bank who owns the ATM. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
As a result, the Savoys received the same judicial treatment as Foster and Mock, who may have been victims of predatory lending (given the high interest rates and origination fees on their loans), but had never paid anything. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
” Once discovered, the problem was immediately patched, and two investigations began. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
U.S.A. et al. ruled that the mosaic would not be given back because the petitioner failed to satisfy three of the five requirements of 18 U.S. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am
Rockefeller et al., No. 655538/2016, 2018 BL 138448 (Sup. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Lohmus, Havel & Viisemann, et al in 2005. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
FORRESTER WINNE, et al., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
§ 2510, et seq. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al. v. [read post]
