Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 81 - 100
of 75,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 6:44 am
Richard reports that Huawei and ZTE have been given permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
A recent decision by the Commonwealth Court of PA, The Bullen Companies v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Melvin Jones and Loleather Jones v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Regina v Hoath; Regina v Standage [2011] WLR (D) 22 “Where a defendant had been given a statutory right of appeal against a refusal to vary a sexual offences prevention order the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division was not precluded from exercising its normal powers on an appeal where there was no express statutory power to make an order on the appeal. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:09 am
See Manning v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:49 am
R v R (Video Recording: Admissibility) [2008] EWCA Crim 678; [2008] WLR (D) 95 “A video recording of an interview given had been was properly admitted as evidence in chief at a criminal trial pursuant to a special measures direction made under s27 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, notwithstanding that no notification had been given by the Secretary of State under s18(2) of the Act that such measures were available. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:32 am
The Tribunal found that after a revised order had been given under clause 24, the cancellation provisions of clause 17 ceased to apply. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:32 am
The Tribunal found that after a revised order had been given under clause 24, the cancellation provisions of clause 17 ceased to apply. [read post]
8 May 2007, 2:48 am
Receivership prevents notice of intention from being given Melville Dundas Ltd. and Others v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
Hearing officer to determine the weight to be given to evidence offered in the course of disciplinary hearingMatter of Board of Educ. of Byram Hills Cent. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 9:07 am
See Bell, 724 S.W.2d at 788 (asking simply whether Miranda warnings were given); see also Rosalez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Shiflett v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:17 am
He relied on the 1891 decision of Pullman v Hill, which involved the plaintiff’s clerk opening a letter intended only for him. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 am
Master Hurst has ruled in Motto & Others v Trafigura (SCCO, 29/06/2011) (click for judgment) that in a CFA funded case interest on costs should not begin to run until costs have been assessed, rather than the earlier date when judgment is given. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 12:49 pm
M.A.B. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:03 pm
.: Farm stiles and gates yield to wheelchair access (2) National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:03 pm
.: Farm stiles and gates yield to wheelchair access (2) National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:49 am
On August 29, 2011, in Bowers v. [read post]
