Search for: "Givens v. Maine Department of Corrections"
Results 41 - 60
of 341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 3:01 pm
Madera v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am
The Court of Appeal’s reasoning was correct. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
The Department of Defense is responsible for our military. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
The correct approach is to interpret the text on broad principles that are generally accepted. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
A way that I think might indicate the correct result.One can go even deeper, of course. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:51 am
In these situations, the court occasionally departs from the ordinary burden on a claimant to prove facts on the balance of probabilities. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that they were or are employed by the Commonwealth’s Department of Corrections in the job classification of Corrections Officers 3 (“CO3 s”). [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am
In view of the main request, the issue of the correction decision of the Examining Division was deferred. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
", in the way that experienced bankruptcy attorneys would.The result reached by the majority was clearly and obviously the correct result. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:58 am
The appellant issued a petition for judicial review against the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
DorfMuch of yesterday's oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
The judgment of the Supreme Court Lady Hale gave the main judgment in the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Given several factors, it seems unlikely that the members of Congress would have to ask that question unless a report had never before been issued: Section 1237(b) as amended requires the Defense Department to update the list yearly and submit it to the armed services committees, Cotton is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and both Gallagher and Gallego are members of the House Armed Services Committee. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:39 am
Maine and the dissents invoke Locke v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
When he returned that day after seeing the doctor, he was given a third corrective action, again a written warning. [read post]
