Search for: "Givens v. McDonald" Results 1 - 20 of 673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm by David S. Cohen
I appreciate the opportunity I had earlier last month to share with you my thoughts on the voting paradox of McDonald v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:05 am by Jason Mazzone
Justice Stevens’s dissenting opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:27 am by Rebecca Davis, Olswang LLP
The post Case Preview: McDonald (Deceased) v National Grid Electricity Transmission PLC appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:19 am by Calvin Massey
    At SCOTUSblog, Lyle Denniston has this report on today's oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:22 am by SHG
A number of emails arrived yesterday asking what I thought the McDonald decision meant for New York City. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:06 am
I had a feeling my post predicting the votes on the Privileges and Immunity argument in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
Regarding the first issue, Lord Brown, with whom Lords Dyson and Walker agreed (Lord Kerr agreed with the result but for different reasons), held that the 2009/2010 care plan reviews did include a reassessment of Ms McDonald’s care needs for the reasons given by Rix LJ in the Court of Appeal at [53], namely: “53. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
RODNEY MCDONALD WILLIAMS Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 13 June 2018 by Judge Henry W. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 11:44 am
Thus, if Liebeck's spill had involved coffee at 155 degrees, the liquid would have cooled and given her time to avoid a serious burn. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court decisions in history, Professor McDonald undertakes the "unenviable task" of defending the Court's 1896 decision in the case of Plessy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 am by Hannah Curtain & George Mallett
In McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 the Supreme Court have confirmed that possession proceedings brought by private landlords are not subject to the same proportionality tests that apply to public sector proceedings. [read post]