Search for: "Givens v. Social Security Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 4:41 am
DHS the challengers asserted that the program exceeded the parole authority given to the administration under INA 212(d)(5) as it can be used ‘only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit’”. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:12 am
"] From B.B. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
And to some extent, all of this is inevitable, given decisions and predilections that have been operationalized with increasing focus since the fall of he Soviet Union and European Marxist-Leninism, made it possible to better align the technologies of Leninism with the ambitions of the European administrative state without the need for justification and the risk of normative opposition of any consequence. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Yet in Griswold v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Editor’s note: This article is part of Just Security’s series on reparation mechanisms in the context of Russia’s war against Ukraine. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
” In a Social Security disability case, the law provides that benefits shall be awarded if a person proves his or her case by the same “clear and convincing evidence” standard that applies in a license reinstatement appeal. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am
& Social Policy 3 (2021). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Healey v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Even apart from the scant factual basis for the Commission’s given reason for needing the no-deny policy, it should be reexamined because a regulatory policy that prevents people from speaking against government action necessarily raises First Amendment concerns. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Given its central importance, overruling Chevron would threaten substantial disruption in federal programs such as Social Security and would upset settled expectations in virtually every area of federal law. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
The Cyberspace Administration of China prioritised the regulation of cross-border data transfers. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:13 am
The plain language captures everything from the White House to toll booths in national parks to Social Security Administration buildings. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
& Social Policy 3 (2021). [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 4:28 am
V. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
Please note that these figures include only federal court securities suit filings; the numbers do not include securities class action lawsuits filed in state court. [read post]
