Search for: "Givens v. UNION INVESTMENT CORPORATION" Results 161 - 180 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul), the Supreme Court heard its second arbitration case, after Dallah Real Estate v Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46, [2011] 1 All ER 485 reported previously in these pages (see NLJ, 21 January 2011, p 104). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
Given the practical challenges of identifying which legislation may apply, particularly for multi-national companies, it is likely that companies may need to adopt the ‘high-water mark’ approach. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Given the cost of preparing the required reports, it is possible that some firms – especially those that are not worried about the adverse publicity or consumer or investor backlash – will opt to pay the penalty instead, though doing so may open them to reputation damage from nonprofit environmental groups, consumers, and pro-climate companies. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:27 am by CFM Admin
California-registered investment advisers (“CA RIAs”) that manage pooled investment vehicles and are deemed to have custody of client assets are also subject to independent party surprise examinations. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:27 am by CFM Admin
California-registered investment advisers (“CA RIAs”) that manage pooled investment vehicles and are deemed to have custody of client assets are also subject to independent party surprise examinations. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:15 am
  That direction is summarized in five recommended actions that states can take:1--Facilitate public and private investment in research & development to spur innovation in trustworthy AI.2--Foster accessible AI ecosystems with digital infrastructure and technologies and mechanisms to share data and knowledge.3--Ensure a policy environment that will open the way to deployment of trustworthy AI systems.4--Empower people with the skills for AI and support workers for a fair… [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
  On the Chinese side, taking a relaxed view about trade talks while using the time to strengthen BRI, Yuan internationalization, infrastructure aid projects through the AIIB, and sovereign investing through Chinese sovereign wealth funds, appeared to have the same strategic goals. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Pacific Investment Management Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
" [11]       Given the union's size, significant opposition stands in the way of the merger. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
Such is the high-profile case of an allegedly Nazi looted Modigliani leaked to have been stored in Geneva Freeport.[29]Maestracci v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  The plaintiffs are the now common-place third party payers (mostly union pension funds) ("TPPs") who claim they paid too much for the drug in reimbursing prescriptions that doctors made for members of TPP plans.In addition to the consumer fraud claims we’ve mentioned, there are state antitrust claims (the issue mostly being whether indirect purchasers barred from recovering under federal antitrust law by Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The response to the Kutak Commission’s proposal generated a new phrase, “Fear of Sears”[2]: One question and its answer derailed any possibility of the MDP and corporate investment proposal during the House of Delegates debate on the package of Kutak Commission proposals; “Does this mean Sears can open a law firm? [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance by Lucian A. [read post]