Search for: "Glasgow v. Mitchell"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
Mitchell Skilling, Scottish Legal News: Glasgow sheriff orders SSE Hydro operators to pay nearly £100,000 to organisers of cancelled evangelical Christian event: another take on Billy Graham Evangelistic Association v Scottish Event Campus Ltd. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
The emergence of platform regulation in the UK: an empirical-legal study, Martin Kretschmer, School of Law, Philip Schlesinger, University of Glasgow, Ula Furgal, University of Glasgow – School of Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
In Gorham et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:47 am
However, following the Supreme Court judgment in Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, that claim was withdrawn. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
There was X v Hounslow,and Glasgow City Council v Mitchell. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Great Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor, heard 11 November 2014. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Great Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor, heard 11 November 2014. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
WILLIAM MACREATH, a partner in the well known Glasgow law firm LEVY MCRAE, and also known as the boss of the LEGAL DEFENCE UNION (LDU), had his ‘Human Rights’ violated under article 6 of ECHR by the Law Society of Scotland with regard to an investigation of a client complaint, according to a written opinion from Lord Drummond Young published by the Court of Session. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am
Those proceedings were concerned with the duties of a coroner, particularly where the death had occurred before the Human Rights Act 1998 had come into force.Ms Hurst had also commenced civil proceedings against the police and the local authority, but these were discontinued on the advice of her legal representatives based on Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire in the Court of Appeal – probably justifiably so,… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am
Those proceedings were concerned with the duties of a coroner, particularly where the death had occurred before the Human Rights Act 1998 had come into force.Ms Hurst had also commenced civil proceedings against the police and the local authority, but these were discontinued on the advice of her legal representatives based on Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire in the Court of Appeal – probably justifiably so,… [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
