Search for: "Glenn v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 (1949) (emphasis added): In dealing with probable cause, however, as the very name implies, we deal with probabilities. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:36 am
Likely because it really isn’t the kind of right the government has been in a mood to trample on for the history of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am by Marissa Miller
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am by Will Baude
  In Windsor, the United States asked for the judgment to be affirmed, which should have scuttled the case. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 11:59 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Clapper, the government acknowledged (in a footnote) that the law "confers authority for collecting the contents of wire communications to or from a person in the United States." [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
As a Verizon customer myself (and one who has spent most of the time covered in the order outside the United States), I harbor no illusions about which of my records are now in Uncle Sam’s possession. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
DIFFUSION AN INTERNATIONAL, INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COMPARATIVE LAW       Co-Sponsored by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law and Juris Diversitas 3 & 4 June 2013 Lausanne, Switzerland  [For additional information, contact Marie Papeil at marie.papeil@isdc-dfjp.unil.ch ] Monday, June 3, 2013 8:30-9:30              Registration, Coffee … [read post]
4 May 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit issued an order in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But is Google facilitating that trend on behalf of law enforcement more rapidly in the United States than elsewhere across the globe? [read post]