Search for: "Glenn v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Later, David Bosco expanded on Bellinger’s piece, examining the merit's of the U.S.'s concerns over the aggression amendments, and why it is increasingly difficult for the United States to prevent their adoption. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Ashley Deeks warned that the United States needs to start thinking about how to address pervasive domestic surveillance in other states, including China. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:55 am by Dave Maass
EFF is asking the Supreme Court to hear arguments in Raynor v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
There clearly is a special role for the press in America’s democracy; the Founders explicitly intended the press to be a crucial check on the power of the federal government, and the United States courts have consistently backed up that role. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by David Kopel
The first post-Heller case to examine an age limit for the Second Amendment was the First Circuit's United States v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am by Tara Hofbauer
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:36 am
Likely because it really isn’t the kind of right the government has been in a mood to trample on for the history of the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
To recap briefly, the document was a secret court order issued under Section 215 of the Patriot Act directing Verizon to provide "on an ongoing daily basis" all call records for any call "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls" and any call made "between the United States and abroad. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Dan Tench
  In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
United States, 914 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2006) (discussed here), which analyzes  blank">Crawford v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
President Obama’s criticism of the Supreme Court’s recent Citizens United decision in Wednesday’s State of the Union address dominated the headlines yesterday and today. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:30 pm
Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending holding of petition pending decision in MetLife v. [read post]