Search for: "Global Associates, Appellant, v. the United States, Appellee" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Ford Global Technologies, LLC (“Ford”), and against Plaintiff-Appellant, Automotive Body Parts Association (“Automotive”). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:53 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument from appellant Qualcomm and appellee the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the antitrust matter originating from the Northern District of California on Thursday, February 13, 2020, at 9:30 AM Pacific Time.The court's website does not yet list the circuit judges on the panel. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:40 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeFraud Convict Loses Ineffective Assistance Claims Against Trial Counsel; Performance 'Exemplary'United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(collectively referred to as Intervenors) contend the trial court erred by entering a judgment confirming an arbitration award that ordered appellants take nothing from appellee Maxus (U.S.) [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Taxpayers also argued that the judgment should be vacated under United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:27 am by Jeff Kuntz
United States Postal Serv., 456 F.3d 1270, 1274 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
The course will also provide those who intend to practice Climate Change Law & Policy in the United States a better understanding of the rationales for the international, national and state mechanisms adopted to face this major problem.Methodology. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
The court found that Egilman had manipulated data to reach misleading conclusions, devoid of scientific validity.[5] Egilman was so distraught by being excluded that he sought to file a personal appeal to the United States Court of Appeal.[6] When the defendant-appellee opposed Egilman’s motion to intervene in the plaintiff’s appeal, Egilman stridently asserted his right to participate,[7] and filed his own declaration.[8] The declaration is required reading… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Each year our Year in Review comments on significant securities-related decisions by the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts and district courts, notes key developments in SEC enforcement, and summarizes significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation against directors and officers of public companies. [read post]