Search for: "Godfrey v USA"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2008, 1:21 am
how "Notice and Take Down" gives ISPs an unwanted role in applying the Law to the internetwritten by: Richard ClaytonInternet Expert, Thus plcrichard@demon.netSummaryThe widely reported out-of-court settlement of the defamation action Godfrey v Demon Internet in favour of the physicist Dr Laurence Godfrey has ignited a debate as to how far Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should be responsible for material on the Internet.Many UK laws are such that the safest… [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
Tobacco Company States Lanham Act Claim Against Online Sellers of 'Grey Market' Cigarettes Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:29 am
The court dealt at length with the common law on the online publication of defamatory statements, using cases such as Godfrey v Demon Internet and Bunt v Tilley. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Oxford, Susman Godfrey, Dallas Anthony A. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Weymouth, MA; Anne Hilbert, President) Aerosoft Usa, Inc. [read post]
