Search for: "Godfrey v. People"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2011, 2:41 am
Places for People Homes Ltd v Sharples; A2 Dominion Homes Ltd v Godfrey [2011] EWCA Civ 813; [2011] WLR (D) 233 “The provisions of the insolvency legislation did not fetter the power of the county court to make a possession order for non-payment of rent against a bankrupt assured tenant or an assured tenant protected by a debt relief order (“DRO”) made under Part 7A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (inserted by section 108(1)… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In Godfrey v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm
In the case of Godfrey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:57 pm
"Bleeding Dodger Blue" focuses on the work of Susman Godfrey attorney Victoria Cook, who, at the time she was called into the McCourt v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
Christina Sharples v Places for People Homes Ltd, Stephen Godfrey v A2 Dominion Homes Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 813 This is actually two appeals which deal with an important question about insolvency and bankruptcy and whether monies that form part of the bankruptcy can be counted as arrears of rent for the purposes of obtaining possession. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
Christina Sharples v Places for People Homes Ltd, Stephen Godfrey v A2 Dominion Homes Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 813 This is actually two appeals which deal with an important question about insolvency and bankruptcy and whether monies that form part of the bankruptcy can be counted as arrears of rent for the purposes of obtaining possession. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
He likened Google to the owner of a wall on which people chose to inscribe graffiti, for which the owner was not responsible. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:37 pm
More documents: Interval Licensing press release on the lawsuit Interval Licensing v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:47 pm
How many times a day do they have to go out there and calm people down? [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 9:06 pm
Yesterday the Texas Fair Defense Project, the UT Civil Rights Clinic, and the law firm Susman Godfrey filed a federal lawsuit to stop the City of Austin from unconstitutionally jailing people for municipal court debt. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
Godfrey v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:25 am
African children’s right to participate in medical decision-making processes Godfrey Dalitso Kangaude, Deevia Bhana & Ann Skelton, Childhood sexuality in Africa: A child rights perspective Alina Miamingi, The applicability of the best interests principle to children of imprisoned mothers in contemporary Africa: Between hard and soft law ArticlesObonye Jonas, Res interpretata principle: Giving domestic effect to the judgments of the African Court on Human and… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Mark Movsesian, Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Future of Religious Freedom, (Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Forthcoming).Marc Tizoc González, Criminalizing Charity: Can First Amendment Free Exercise of Religion, RFRA, and RLUIPA Protect People Who Share Food in Public? [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeConsolidation of Charged Offenses Against Defendant Found an Inappropriate Exercise of Discretion People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
Unfiltered complaints v. investigated complaints: do client a big favor (and the AG too) by providing input early on. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
The Supreme Court had decided in Godfrey v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:20 am
Godfrey, Nathan T. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am
Dr Duffy then brought proceedings for libel, pleading a broad range of defamatory imputations including that she stalked psychics; obsessively and persistently harassed psychics; fraudulently and/or maliciously accessed other people’s electronic emails and materials; spread lies; threatened and manipulated other people; was an embarrassment to her profession; misused her work email address for private purposes and engaged in criminal conduct. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm
In the late 19th century, Lord Shand observed at page 1113 of Godfrey v W & D C Thomson (1890) 17 R 1108: “… I think that in these times persons must be allowed to speak pretty freely of public political conduct and principles …” Mr Crow aruged that the leaflets were capable of meaning that he was one of those involved in the scandals, waste and other matters referred to. [read post]
