Search for: "Godfrey v. Precision" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Justin Nelson
Justin Nelson is a partner at Susman Godfrey L.L.P. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Godfrey, 2017 BCCA 302 (37810) Should this Competition Act class action be certified. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm by INFORRM
He suggested that the position “may well be fact sensitive”, pointing to the differences between the position in law of the ISPs in Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201), Bunt v Tilley (2006 EWHC 407 (QB)), and of Google Inc in Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. (2009 EWHC 1765 (QB)). [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 7:26 am by Giles Peaker
Mr Godfrey submitted that sub-section (4) was a gateway provision: when its preconditions were met, the obligation was deemed to arise; and, critically, this was exactly the same obligation as one sees in sub-section (1). [read post]