Search for: "Godfrey v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 7:45 am by Bill Raftery
Harris, 1 Binn. 416 (1808)), New Jersey until at least 1851 (Godfrey v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 am by Gyi Tsakalakis
And don’t allow it to become, as Bruce Godfrey puts it: a total trainwreck of a time suck. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:36 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rudewicz, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 499 (24 April 2012) Godfrey, R (on the application of) v Southwark [2012] EWCA Civ 500 (24 April 2012) Westlb AG v Nomura Bank International Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 495 (24 April 2012) Lalli v Spirita Housing Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 497 (24 April 2012) Greenwich Community Law Centre, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:55 am by Bexis
  Not to step on McConnell, who will be looking at Gianvito v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
Godfrey v Demon Internet represented an application of unvarnished traditional doctrine to the internet. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm by INFORRM
He suggested that the position “may well be fact sensitive”, pointing to the differences between the position in law of the ISPs in Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201), Bunt v Tilley (2006 EWHC 407 (QB)), and of Google Inc in Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. (2009 EWHC 1765 (QB)). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
No. 09–0724 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and EMC INSURANCE COMPANIES v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:53 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 9/7/11Cite: Thiesing v. [read post]