Search for: "Goetz v Volpe"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
In the context of a legal malpractice action involving concurrent representation by the defendant and non-party counsel in the same underlying litigation or transaction, New York courts have consistently found that the privilege is waived with respect to communications with the non-party counsel concerning the litigation or transaction (Goetz v Volpe, 11 Misc3d 632, 635 [Sup Ct, NY County 2006]). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Volpe v. [read post]