Search for: "Golden v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) rejected a challenge to 2014 EPA rules regulating emission testing requirements for new motor vehicles, 40 C.F.R. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Strike 3 asserts that it has used a combination of forensic and geolocation technology to tie a single IP address, registered to a user in the District of Columbia, to twenty-two acts of infringement on specified dates over the course of a year. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am by Jennifer González
The case was argued in the District Court of the District of Columbia and appealed. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
(Class 99) More Octopus Paul trade marks (Class 46) (Class 46) Never mind the golden rabbits, what about the Golden Balls? [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am by Mary Anne Peck
Rice’s ruling preserved, for the time being, access to the drug in at least the 17 states involved, as well as the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
We are, some might argue, in a new golden age of television, with shows that are enjoyed by millions. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:42 pm
Although that decision of the District of Columbia Circuit is not binding on our court, we find its reasoning persuasive. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Labour Law: Grievances; PrivacyYork Region District School Board v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
Voisine's firearm prohibition does extend beyond the permissible "longstanding prohibitions" identified in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Nicole Baarts and Megha Charalambides
EEOC, a federal district court in the District of Columbia found that the EEOC rules were unlawful, on the ground that the EEOC had failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to adopt the 30% incentive levels. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The truth often is that, for one reason or another, the prescribing physician did not rely on the particular warning in question, and thus a different one wouldn’t have made any difference.There are a number of fact patterns that lead to physician non-reliance, the golden boy of the bunch being when a doctor (a trained professional, after all) already knew about the risk in question and thus did not need to be warned about it. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Change to ‘consisting of’ language during reexam limits damages: Kim v. [read post]