Search for: "Goldman v Stein"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm
Goldman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 10:51 am
Stein v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:53 am
The Delaware Chancery’s refusal to dismiss a derivative allegation in a suit claiming that Goldman Sachs directors were paid excessively may soon provide a decision that offers companies guidance on setting board of director pay (Stein v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Stein v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
Stein v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
A claim to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166 [2001]; Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957 [2016]). [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
Finally, in 1986’s Goldman v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court also properly determined that although the defendant Miller, Rosado & Algios, LLP, established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the legal malpractice cause of action insofar as asserted by the respondents against it, the respondents raised triable issues of fact in opposition (see Silva v Worby, Groner, Edelman, LLP, 54 AD3d 634; see also Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007; Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d 912, 913; Boglia… [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:28 am
Goldman and Harvey I. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am
Pursuant to the doctrine of continuous representation, “ ’the time within which to sue on the [cause of action] is tolled until the attorney’s continuing representation of the client with regard to the particular matter terminates’ ” (Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789, quoting Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957 [2016]). [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
CONTRACTS, HEALTH LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW Goldman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
“The causation element requires a showing that the injured party would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
Lisa Daniels, David Kimball-Stanley and Ed Stein summarized Judge Theodore Chuang’s order for a preliminary injunction on the most recent travel ban in IRAP v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:26 am
“Whether a plaintiff can ultimately establish its allegations is not part of the calculus in determining a motion to dismiss” (EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 NY3d 11, 19 [2005]; see Carlson v American Intl. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:35 am
” A 2010 Fourth Circuit case, Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:09 am
The memo take great pains to emphasize that while the case was pending, the Second Circuit entered its opinion in Fait v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 9:35 am
It was a routine summary of the Cubby v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:02 pm
[v] Stein v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Law Center) Jim Gibson (Univ. of Richmond School of Law) Eric Goldman (Santa Clara Univ. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Finally, Eric Goldman, associate professor at Santa Clara University School of Law has been tracking cases involving social media evidence on his blog, as drawn to our attention by Eric E. [read post]
