Search for: "Goldstein v. California" Results 301 - 320 of 560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
 Independent Living Center of Southern California . . . . [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Mortgage Bankers Association, in which (along with Nickols v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
At RH Reality Check, Jessica Mason Pieklo weighs in on Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
” In a post at Harmless Error, Luke Rioux compares the Court’s recent decision in Riley v California, holding that police must generally obtain a warrant to search an arrestee’s cellphone, with last year’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by Amy Howe
  The Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
California, one of two cases about whether the police, when they arrest someone, may search the contents of his cellphone without a warrant. [read post]