Search for: "Goldstein v. California"
Results 341 - 360
of 560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in both Walden v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
California, a Fourth Amendment case on third-party consent. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
[Disclosure: Tom Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., the publisher of this blog, argued Walden on behalf of the respondents; the firm's Kevin Russell was among the counsel to the petitioner in Fernandez.] [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
California – police authority under Fourth Amendment to search a smartphone taken from an individual at the time of arrest United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
And in the third decision of the day, Burrage v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
California, 13-494, a capital case involving a Batson challenge arising out of a crime allegedly committed in California’s newest entrepreneurial hot spot. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Riley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:33 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents Edward Lane, the petitioner in Lane v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
Last June, in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
California, 13-494, is literally straight outta Compton. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
SAP America, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:43 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
California v. [read post]
