Search for: "Goldstein v. California"
Results 401 - 420
of 560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm
Arzoumanian v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
Goldstein, P.C., was among the counsel to the respondents in Bush v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
Last up, out of the California Court of Appeals, is Fernandez v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am
With the Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
Amar concludes that even if the Court “finds no sponsor standing in federal court, how broadly available same-sex marriage will be in California might still take some time to sort out. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:22 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Goldstein v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
Durkin The recent Apple v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Perry, in which it argues that California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage violates the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Kevin Russell, also of Goldstein & Russell, filed an amicus brief on behalf of former senators in support of the respondents in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8. [read post]
