Search for: "Goldstein v. California"
Results 421 - 440
of 560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
(For an example of an appointment on the question of jurisdiction, see not only the Windsor case but also Hohn v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
One of the earliest and most influential cases to enunciate this doctrine was Pope v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
In Koontz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
California satisfies the requirement for a defendant to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require reappointment of counsel to file a motion for new trial. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am
Miller, McIntyre in Context: A Very Personal Perspective, 63 South Carolina Law Review 465 (2012) - Carol Sanger, “The Birth of Death”: Stillborn Birth Certificates and the Problem for Law, 100 California Law Review 269 (2012) V. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Stephanie Francis Ward of the ABA Journal interviews and profiles Tom Goldstein of this blog. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 8:30 am
Quach, Sterne Kessler Goldstein and Fox PLLC for Law360. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 5:15 pm
Tom Goldstein, Founding Partner, Goldstein & Russell P.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
Briefly: At the blog Sentencing Law and Policy, Douglas Berman discusses a recent report in the Sacramento Bee regarding the “implementation challenges for California’s prison realignment” in the wake of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
This weekend’s coverage of the Court concentrated on developments in the constitutional challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage, Fisher v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:24 am
Over at the Crime and Consequences blog, Kent Scheidegger reports that California is seeking a modification of the prisoner release order upheld in Brown v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:44 am
Looking ahead to this fall’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am
Briefly: California has announced that it is unlikely that it will be able to comply with the reductions to its prison population ordered by a three-judge panel and upheld by the Court in its 2011 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Briefly: The University of California, Irvine School of Law hosted a panel discussion on OT2011. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Decker v. [read post]
