Search for: "Goldstein v. Hhs" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
 As Tom Goldstein suggests, it appears HHS could prevail by altering some of the language on the form (particularly that which indicates contraception coverage will be provided) and allowing the objector to submit the form to the government instead of to the insurer or third-party administrator. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
  Steve Vladeck previewed the habeas case Duncan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.; (2) whether HHS can satisfy RFRA's demanding test for overriding sincerely held religious objections in circumstances where HHS itself insists that overriding the religious objection will not fulfill HHS's regulatory objective - namely, the provision of no-cost contraceptives to the objector's employees; and (3) whether the First Amendment allows HHS to discriminate among nonprofit religious employers who share the same… [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm by Andrew Pincus
  [Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the Erica P. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The religious non-profits challenging the mandate in the combined cases of Zubik v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Today the Court released its decisi0n in HHS v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  Tom Goldstein and other Court observers think it is very unlikely he would upend the solution he apparently negotiated in Hobby Lobby. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Rogers College of Law, Promotion of Drugs and Devices: Off-Label and No-LabelJason Smith, California State University, East Bay, Health, the First Amendment and the Ethics of the Patient-Physician Interaction Health Care Financing and Regulation Session 1B – Room 245Developments in Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity: Enforcement, Guidance and ImplementationModerator: Paul Lombardo, Georgia State University College of LawMelissa Alexander, University of Wyoming College of Law, Autonomy… [read post]