Search for: "Goldwater v. Carter" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
He will describe generally the political question doctrine (“PQD”) and identify the parties in Goldwater v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Circuit sitting en banc in 1979 on the political question issue in Goldwater v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:30 am by Kate Fort
Finally, in one of the strangest and most unprecedented actions in the case, the Ohio AG filed an amicus brief in support of Goldwater and against the Arizona AG’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:05 am by Kate Fort
Here is the case page. 20_Opening Brief_09-01-2017 40_AZResponse 41_GilaNavajoResponse 42_USResponse And yes, the case caption should eventually change–Carter et. al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:23 am by Kate Fort
This is otherwise known as the Goldwater litigation, the second federal case filed back in 2015 in Arizona. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  As the Society explains:Watch the re-enactment of the 1979 en banc argument in Goldwater v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:03 pm by Kate Fort
This should be the end of this litigation (the original 2015 “Goldwater case”), as the Ninth Circuit vacated and remanded the case below to have it dismissed as moot. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm by Kate Fort
This case was originally the In re A.D. case, the same A.D. who was the Goldwater Institute’s named plaintiff in Carter (A.D.) v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Scott R. Anderson
A recent series of statements by President Donald Trump has resurrected concerns about the United States’ long-standing commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 7:16 pm
He chose a position between the liberal Democrats and George Wallace, supporting Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Peter M. Shane
 This would follow the Court’s plurality approach in Goldwater v. [read post]