Search for: "Gonzales v. Marshall" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Court held possession of a gun was not economic (in Lopez), but that possession of marijuana for home use was (in Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm by Ilya Somin
As for me, I always believed that the mandate was unconstitutional, but initially thought that it could be justified under the Supreme Court’s decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
However, it is not the IJ’s job to marshal evidence of a true religious conviction. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm by Elizabeth Price Foley
The Court declared that the farmer’s actions were not to be viewed in isolation, but rather assessed “together with that of many others similarly situated . . . .” Wickard‘s aggregation principle was reaffirmed by Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Rehnquist (who clerked for Justice Jackson), to the ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am by Eugene Volokh
RFRA and RLUIPA have been applied by the Supreme Court three times, once allowing a religious exemption along conservative-liberal lines (Hobby Lobby), and twice allowing it unanimously (Gonzales v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
” If the federal government can legislate on virtually anything that might be considered a “national problem” in some sense, we end up with the status quo, in which it can ban the distribution or possession of almost anything (including, in the case of Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Corey Robin in connection with Robin’s new book, “The Enigma of Clarence Thomas” (Metropolitan Books, 2019). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
” Another example is even closer to home for you, given your involvement in the 2005 medical marijuana case of Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
Here’s how Chief Justice John Roberts put it in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]