Search for: "Gonzalez v. On Habeas Corpus"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 9:17 am
Lumpkin 23-323Issue: Whether a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion claiming that habeas counsel’s abandonment prevented the consideration of a petitioner’s claims should always be recharacterized as a second or successive habeas petition under Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm
Two of the three criminal cases (one of them a habeas corpus petition, which is by definition somewhat urgent) have been taken under submission. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:58 pm
Gonzalez The court divided 6-3 along familiar lines in Garland v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
The respondents then filed habeas corpus petitions in federal court. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 2:24 pm
Gonzalez The second case, Garland v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Gonzalez in 2006—that, as the majority put it in RNC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:38 am
Cyr, the Supreme Court addressed one of these bars, and found that because Congress had not expressly stated that the provision was intended to strip federal courts of jurisdiction to consider petitions for habeas corpus, the bar could not be read to foreclose review of Enrico St. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:36 am
Bannister argues that Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 8:11 am
In June of this year, the Supreme Court granted Banister’s petition for certiorari, reframing the questions presented in his (pro se) petition as “[w]hether and under what circumstances a timely Rule 59(e) motion should be recharacterized as a second or successive habeas petition under Gonzalez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Davis, 18-6943 Issues: (1) Whether Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
LEXIS 3682 (ED CA, Jan. 10, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge, ruling on an inmate's habeas corpus petition, recommended concluding that a state court was reasonable when it held that an inmate's free exercise rights were not violated by using his religious necklace with the Eternal Warrior Shield as evidence of affiliation with the Mexican Mafia.In Skandha v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am
At the Michigan Law Review’s First Impressions, Leah Litman argues that the “petitions for original writs of habeas corpus raising questions about” the retroactivity of last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Nov. 18, 2015) The petitioner sought a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the District Court to secure release from ICE detention through an individualized bond hearing. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:31 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
., § 280 and as held in People v Jackson, People v Krank, except where time is a material ingredient of the crime the prosecution is not confined in its evidence to the precise date laid in the indictment, but may prove that the offense was committed at any time prior to the commencement of the prosecution and such proof does not constitute a material variance. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Joyner, Fourth Circuit: The district court improperly denied a petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:40 am
In Londano v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 1934043, (D. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:40 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: AC33057 - Gonzalez v. [read post]
