Search for: "Gonzalez v. Rushing"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2007, 12:33 pm
Much more.Finally, I couldn't help thinking, as I read the case, about those famous words by Rush lyricist Neal Pert. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 am
In Bernal v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am
See my debrief on the companion Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:39 am
" So the takeaway from the decision in People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:19 am
")Hudson, Faralick, and Sautter, Lightning But No Thunder: The Need For Clarity in Military Courts Regarding the Definition of Mental retardation in Capital Cases and for Procedures in Implementing Atkins v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
(Opinion by Rushing, P.J., with McAdams, J., concurring. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Maybe Google will now strike the same kind of agreement with Match Group, though it's unclear how soon the trial in the Match Group case will take place (theoretically the court could try to rush things the way Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers did in Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:09 am
(You can read the history of it all in Grant v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
It relied heavily on Purcell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Lester’s petition was filed after Allen and Gates and James had already been relisted five times, making me wonder whether my boy Jack rushed to file a petition hoping the court would pick this case to be the sole combatant on this issue. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am
Buyer v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
Casto’s article “Dear Sister Antillico…”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
