Search for: "Good et al v. American Water Works Company, Inc. et al" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637, 658-65 (2013); and in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Upstate Citizens for Equality, Inc v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Protecting Americans from unlawful commercial surveillance and data security practices is critical work, and I look forward to undertaking this effort with both the necessary urgency and rigor. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
”  Shortly after taking office President Trump made good on that promise, mandating “development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures” and processes to “ensur[e] the proper collection of all information necessary for a rigorous evaluation of all grounds of inadmissibility. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:42 am by Bennett Cyphers
Now, in the wake of the Visa announcement, two new lawsuits (Cottle et al v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
This is good news for debtors filing bankruptcy who have non-filing spouses who are the sole breadwinners. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
The reason is simple: technology companies know that consumers want a product that works well, not simply one that looks good. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Chicago, et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by WIMS
  San Pedro Boat Works, et al American Commercial Lines LLC v. [read post]