Search for: "Good v. Martin" Results 81 - 100 of 1,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2010, 10:32 am by Eugene Volokh
David Cole, Ken Karst, David Post, Martin Redish, William Van Alstyne, Jonathan Varat, and Adam Winkler. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:17 am by Kevin
“But it’s a constant reminder that we should use knowledge for good, even if the process is ugly. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am by Susan Hennessey
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement over the weekend: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 28 MAY 2016 Good evening. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am by John Enser
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Martin[i] provides a good example. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:07 am
Another good post from Professor Martin yesterday, this time concerning In Re Marriage of Barthold (1st Dist. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Marty felt that the amount of money pumped into top level domain names would ensure that they'd remain important for a good few years to come. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 5:09 am
"As Judge Martin's dissent points out, the McClain decision appears to be in conflict with Sixth Circuit precedent, particularly United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am by Susan Hennessey
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement on Saturday, February 13th: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 13 FEBRUARY 2016 Good evening. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:41 pm by Dwight Sullivan
A visitor whose actions are prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the Depot is considered undesirable and will not be permitted entry to the station. [read post]