Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 8,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
Technically, the State Bar doesn't admit -- or refuse to admit -- anyone to the Bar. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Curiously, the NPRM stipulated a 25% share restriction that neither California nor any other state has adopted. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
He transferred the contents of the “Good Stuff” folder onto a thumb drive and uploaded them to a computer issued to him by Bruin. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Int’l Amateur Athletic Fed’n, 23 F.3d 1110, 1116–17 (6th Cir. 1994) (considering state law tort and contract claims when determining personal jurisdiction to confirm a domestic arbitral award); Glencore Grain, 284 F.3d at 1123–24 (analyzing the sale of rice to California distributors in evaluating personal jurisdiction to confirm a foreign arbitral award); Greenfield Advisors LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm by Daly Barnett
There are some piecemeal attempts at data protection for healthcare workers in more protective states like California (one which we’ve covered). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For that reason, a properly crafted rule (of the kind most universities have) to prevent it would certainly be constitutionally permissible, and (in my opinion) a good idea. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
A fascinating legal soap opera is now underway following a trial just completed in California. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Indeed, especially because of partisan gerrymandering, it was possible for Republicans in the state to garner more than half the state’s electors (if they won enough congressional districts) even if the Democratic candidate got more votes (that were packed into a smaller number of congressional districts) statewide.Whatever one thinks of the virtues of winner-take-all vs. district-by-district as a general matter, it would be good if states decided on their… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Jeffrey J. Spina-Jennings
According to the Regulations, the determination is based on whether the organization is being operated for the “common good and general welfare of the people of the community” or “for the purposes of bringing about civic betterments and social improvements. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm by Josh Blackman
I am very familiar with this limbo, as the Defense Distributed case is stuck somewhere between the Garden State and the Lone Star State. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]