Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 8,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
The good news, though, is that wiring harnesses are relatively inexpensive. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
But there’s a good chance that most states would find universities subject to Rosen-type duties. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But students and faculty have no special or greater entitlement to protest state action or institutional decisions than anyone else in this country. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
Technically, the State Bar doesn't admit -- or refuse to admit -- anyone to the Bar. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Curiously, the NPRM stipulated a 25% share restriction that neither California nor any other state has adopted. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
He transferred the contents of the “Good Stuff” folder onto a thumb drive and uploaded them to a computer issued to him by Bruin. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Jackson, which has been consolidated under United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:26 am
Susan V. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Int’l Amateur Athletic Fed’n, 23 F.3d 1110, 1116–17 (6th Cir. 1994) (considering state law tort and contract claims when determining personal jurisdiction to confirm a domestic arbitral award); Glencore Grain, 284 F.3d at 1123–24 (analyzing the sale of rice to California distributors in evaluating personal jurisdiction to confirm a foreign arbitral award); Greenfield Advisors LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:52 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
There are some piecemeal attempts at data protection for healthcare workers in more protective states like California (one which we’ve covered). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For that reason, a properly crafted rule (of the kind most universities have) to prevent it would certainly be constitutionally permissible, and (in my opinion) a good idea. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
A fascinating legal soap opera is now underway following a trial just completed in California. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Circuit’s long-awaited decision is State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:23 am
The case is entitled Carter v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, especially because of partisan gerrymandering, it was possible for Republicans in the state to garner more than half the state’s electors (if they won enough congressional districts) even if the Democratic candidate got more votes (that were packed into a smaller number of congressional districts) statewide.Whatever one thinks of the virtues of winner-take-all vs. district-by-district as a general matter, it would be good if states decided on their… [read post]
