Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
The California Supreme Court has upheld the application of the state’s consumer protection laws in cases involving mislabeled goods. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:35 am
The Board of Trustees of the California State University System, et. al. (06cv 1682 JAH, SDCA February 5, 2008). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:21 pm
State of California: pauma-band-opening-brief.pdf california-answer-brief.pdf Lower court materials here. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm
In Crest v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
California), because pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code title to the goods passed to TAW in California where TAW was required to pay state excise taxes on the products it resold in the state. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 5:08 am
State of California. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:17 pm
In no particular oder, I begin with the California Supreme Court's opinion in Harris v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:21 am
., the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California will present a webinar on Rose and Zhang. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
The California Supreme Court set forth criteria for DUI checkpoints to ensure they are in compliance with the Federal and California's State Constitution and to minimalize the intrusiveness of the stop in Ingersoll v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm
The California Court of Appeals decision in Lewis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 9:31 am
State of California: 10-17803 From the court’s syllabus: The en banc court affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of a tribe that alleged that the State of California had failed to negotiate in good faith for a gaming compact under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act for Class III gaming on a parcel of land taken into trust for the tribe by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am
Meanwhile, amid a spate of arrests by the California State Highway Patrol of marijuana delivery drivers and seizure of their cannabis company goods, the California Office of Administrative Law issued a ruling last week issued a ruling clarifying how marijuana distributors should move about the state. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
”) California v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 pm
Newman v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
The California Supreme Court decided that a person who pulls another person from a potentially dangerous situation, causing injury to the endangered person in the process, is not protected by the state’s Good Samaritan laws. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm
Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), maintained that “state law bearing on contracts of adhesion remains good law. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:20 pm
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
Turns out I do a pretty good job predicting the Cal. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
In Exide Technologies v. [read post]
