Search for: "Goode v. Gaines" Results 81 - 100 of 4,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Ross Schulman
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 7:03 am by Evan Brown
Kelly Toys Holdings, LLC v. 19885566 Store et al., 2023 WL 8936307 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
The election was dominated by competing slates of candidates: the Good Governance Coalition (GGC) and FullStop. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
David Hooper, now retired from practice as a media lawyer, but who has certainly not lost his touch for adventure, has written a good book about some bad people. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
The new statute amended certain sections of the Trademark Act 1965, and defines a trade mark to include a mark used in relation to goods or services for the purpose of indicating a connection between the goods or services, and may include the shape of goods, their packaging, and combination of colours; and be used in relation to a certification trademark, registered or deemed to have been registered under the Act.Africa map with ethnic motif patternMarch: In Nigeria, the… [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has finalized amendments (“Amended Regulation”) to its cybersecurity rule (“Cybersecurity Rule”) that applies to financial institutions licensed by the NYDFS. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
There is an ongoing debate over whether the MQD is a substantive canon that serves separation of powers or simply a tool of ordinary statutory interpretation, as Justice Barrett argued in her concurrence in Biden v. [read post]