Search for: "Goode v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 49,900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2019, 3:05 pm by Eric Goldman
Aug. 13, 2019) The post Domain Name Registrar Isn’t Liable for Counterfeit Goods–InvenTel v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 12:50 pm by Howard Wasserman
Ortega came to the United States unlawfully as a teen; he has been here 28 years, gotten married, had 3 children (one of whom is in college), and become a successful businessman--he is, as Judge Reinhardt said, a "good hombre. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:27 am by Maurice Sheridan, Matrix
The judgments in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (McGeogh) v The Lord President of the Council and Another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63 were handed down in October 2013. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:26 am
What he did was a good thing, but The Colorado State Patrol says what he was doing before the collision was not okay. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:15 pm by Pedro Celis
On remand from the Supreme Court, the Sixth Circuit considered United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:47 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Tracey Maclin (Boston University - School of Law) has posted Anthony Amsterdam's Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment, and What It Teaches About the Good and Bad in Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:54 pm
 After both sides rested Wednesday, the prosecution after a good night's rest decided to call a rebuttal witness. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 2:49 am
R (Teleos and others) v Customs and Excise Commissioners “There could only be an intra-Community acquisition and supply of goods if the goods actually left the territory of the Member State of supply, but where the goods were fraudulently retained in that State, the supplier could not be made liable for VAT if he was unaware of the fraud and had taken all reasonable steps to ensure that he was not participating in tax evasion. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 4:10 am
Peter discusses the Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
”The Indiana Supreme Court chose to focus on whether the evidence seized during the search was admissible under the good faith exception set forth in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:21 pm by Miguel Larios
Supreme Court handed down an opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:37 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Theft of goods valued between $1,000 and $10,000 Appellant, Trey Murduck, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of theft of goods valued between $1,000 and $10,000, second degree assault of Officer David Zovistoski, and resisting arrest. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:29 pm by dougkans
On August 19, 2015, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued a potentially game-changing decision in State v. [read post]